首页> 外文OA文献 >Are American College of Rheumatology 50% response criteria superior to 20% criteria in distinguishing active aggressive treatment in rheumatoid arthritis clinical trials reported since 1997? A meta‐analysis of discriminant capacities

【2h】

Are American College of Rheumatology 50% response criteria superior to 20% criteria in distinguishing active aggressive treatment in rheumatoid arthritis clinical trials reported since 1997? A meta‐analysis of discriminant capacities

机译：自1997年以来，在风湿性关节炎临床试验中，美国风湿病学会的50％反应标准是否优于20％标准？判别能力的荟萃分析

代理获取

本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务，本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文，但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁，仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况，如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

页面导航

著录项
相似文献
相关主题

著录项

作者
Chung, C P; Thompson, J L; Koch, G G; Amara, I; Strand, V; Pincus, T;
展开▼
作者单位

展开▼
年度 2006
总页数
原文格式 PDF
正文语种 en
中图分类

相似文献

外文文献
中文文献

1. Systematic review and network meta-analysis of combination and monotherapy treatments in disease-modifying antirheumatic drug-experienced patients with rheumatoid arthritis: analysis of American College of Rheumatology criteria scores 20, 50, and 70 [J] . Michelle E Orme, Katherine S MacGilchrist, Stephen Mitchell, Biologics: Targets and Therapy . 2012,第6期

机译：对患有抗风湿病的类风湿性关节炎患者进行系统回顾和联合和单药治疗的网络荟萃分析：美国风湿病学会标准评分分别为20、50和70的分析
2. Rheumatoid Arthritis Response Criteria and Patient-Reported Improvement in Arthritis Activity: Is an American College of Rheumatology Twenty Percent Response Meaningful to Patients? [J] . Ward Michael M., Guthrie Lori C., Alba Maria I. Arthritis & rheumatology. . 2014,第9期

机译：类风湿关节炎反应标准和患者活动性关节炎活动的改善：美国风湿病学院百分之二十的反应对患者有意义吗？
3. Rheumatoid Arthritis Response Criteria and Patient-Reported Improvement In Arthritis Activity: Is an American College of Rheumatology Twenty Percent Response Meaningful to Patients? [J] . Michael M. Ward, Lori C. Guthrie, Maria I. Alba Arthritis and Rheumatism . 2014,第9期

机译：类风湿关节炎反应标准和患者报告的关节炎活动改善：美国风湿病学院百分之二十的反应对患者有意义吗？
4. Are American College of Rheumatology 50 response criteria superior to 20 criteria in distinguishing active aggressive treatment in rheumatoid arthritis clinical trials reported since 1997? A meta‐analysis of discriminant capacities [O] . C P Chung, J L Thompson, G G Koch, 2006

机译：自1997年以来在风湿性关节炎临床试验中美国风湿病学会的50％反应标准是否优于20％标准？判别能力的荟萃分析
5. An index of the three core data set patient questionnaire measures distinguishes efficacy of active treatment from that of placebo as effectively as the American College of Rheumatology 20 response criteria (ACR20) or the Disease Activity Score (DAS) in a rheumatoid arthritis clinical trial [O] . T. Pincus, V. Strand, G. Koch, 2003

机译：三个核心数据集患者问卷调查措施的指数区分了安慰剂的活跃治疗与美国风湿病学院的响应标准（ACR20）或类风湿性关节炎临床试验中的疾病活动评分（DAS）的疗效区分了活跃治疗的疗效

Are American College of Rheumatology 50% response criteria superior to 20% criteria in distinguishing active aggressive treatment in rheumatoid arthritis clinical trials reported since 1997? A meta‐analysis of discriminant capacities

著录项

相似文献

相关主题

期刊订阅